💭 Motion Statistics
Round 1

That, as the Australian Labor Party, we would not call a federal election in 2024 (ALP)

8%
8%
1 Aff win 1 Neg win
balance inconclusive
27%
27%
7 Aff vetoes 7 Neg vetoes
probably balanced

That we oppose the requirement for Australian public servants to be publicly apolitical (Public servants)

View Info Slide
15%
15%
2 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
15%
12%
4 Aff vetoes 3 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That liberal democracies should prohibit non-democratic or democracy undermining candidates from running for public office (Democracy)

8%
46%
1 Aff win 6 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
8%
12%
2 Aff vetoes 3 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Round 2

That we should subsidise credit unions (Credit unions)

View Info Slide
23%
8%
3 Aff wins 1 Neg win
balance inconclusive
19%
15%
5 Aff vetoes 4 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That Australia should raise minimum wages (Minimum wage)

23%
0 Aff wins 3 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
19%
19%
5 Aff vetoes 5 Neg vetoes
probably balanced

That we support a two-year rent freeze (Rent freeze)

23%
23%
3 Aff wins 3 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
12%
15%
3 Aff vetoes 4 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Round 3

That we oppose the concept of a 'girls' girl' (Girls' girl)

15%
15%
2 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
31%
8 Aff vetoes 0 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That, as the Women’s Tennis Association, we would accept Saudi Arabia’s proposal (WTA)

View Info Slide
31%
15%
4 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
15%
15%
4 Aff vetoes 4 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That, as a professional woman, we would self-promote rather than let our work speak for ourself (Self-promotion)

23%
3 Aff wins 0 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
35%
1 Aff veto 9 Neg vetoes
imbalanced at 2% level
Round 4

That we regret the concept of an individual carbon footprint (Carbon footprint)

33%
25%
4 Aff wins 3 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
17%
1 Aff veto 4 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That the Australian government should incentivise Australian firms to supply American green transition projects (e.g., supplying nickel and lithium) rather than subsidise domestic green corporations (e.g., subsidising battery research) (Green transition)

View Info Slide
8%
17%
1 Aff win 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
21%
13%
5 Aff vetoes 3 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That we support states in federations having the right to collect income taxes (Income taxes)

17%
0 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
25%
21%
6 Aff vetoes 5 Neg vetoes
probably balanced
Round 5

That we prefer a world where research was most dominantly conducted outside of universities as opposed to within them (Outside research)

27%
0 Aff wins 3 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
32%
7 Aff vetoes 1 Neg veto
balance inconclusive

That universities should heavily prioritise providing needs-based scholarships over achievement-based scholarships (e.g., academic, sport, music scholarships) (Scholarships)

18%
2 Aff wins 0 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
36%
1 Aff veto 8 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That we oppose the automatic classification of social science research projects involving Indigenous participants as greater than low risk (Risk)

View Info Slide
27%
27%
3 Aff wins 3 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
14%
9%
3 Aff vetoes 2 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Semifinals

That, as Iran, we would strongly pressure the Houthis to stop attacks on commercial shipping (Iran)

100%
0 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
No teams vetoed this motion
Grand Final

That feminists should reject legal and conventional presumptions that are favourable to women (e.g., presumptive custody of children, 'women and children first' in disasters and emergencies etc.) (Feminist presumptions)

100%
0 Aff wins 1 Neg win
balance inconclusive
No teams vetoed this motion